JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 13, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Fundacion Nacional De Especialistas En Rescates Y Urgencias Medicas –Erum- Vs. Departamento Del Quindio Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo De Ejecucion De Penas Y Medidas De Seguridad De Armenia Y El Juzgado Segundo Administrativo Del Circuito De Armenia. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Segundo De Ejecucion De Penas Y Medidas De Seguridad De Armenia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Juez de superior e inferior jerarquía hace parte de la jurisdicción constitucional
  • Competencia de Juez de Ejecución de Penas y Medidas de Seguridad
  • Función residual de la Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia del superior jerárquico común
Juez Constitucional
  • No tiene competencia para cambiar la naturaleza de la acción y debe proceder de manera inmediata a resolver de fondo
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. REMITASE el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por la Fundacion Nacional de Especialistas en Rescate y Urgencias Medicas -ERUM- contra el Departamento del Quindio - Instituto Seccional de Salud, Comite Departamental de Recursos Humanos, al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. de Ejecucion de Penas y Medidas de Seguridad de Armenia para que le de tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.